Legal Opinion

Ruisi v. O'SULLIVAN

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 1, 2011No. AC 32912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEAR, J.

The defendant, Timothy O’Sullivan, executive director of the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection of the state of New York (fund), appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to strike the complaint of the plaintiff, Natale Ruisi, on the ground of sovereign immunity. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court erred in denying his motion and in declining to consider his claim of sovereign immunity. We conclude that the court improperly declined to consider the merits of the defendant’s sovereign immunity defense, and, accordingly, we set aside the judgment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nevada v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Simmons v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Chrysler Credit Corporation v. Fairfield Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. D'ERAMO v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berglass v. DworkinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  2. Harger v. OdlumConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API