Legal Opinion
Flanagan v. Blumenthal
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 3, 2007No. AC 27448PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
General Statutes § 5-Mld, 1 as amended in 2005 by Public Acts 2005, No. 05-114, § 3 (d) (P.A. 05-114), permits a state officer or employee to bring an action in the Superior Court against the state for indemnification for legal fees and costs incurred by such officer or employee in the defense of any civil action in any state or federal court arising out of any alleged act, omission or deprivation that occurred or is alleged to have occurred in the scope of employment. The determinative issue in this appeal is whether P.A. 05-114 should be applied retroactively. Because we…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Reid v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- D'ERAMO v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- St. George v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Flanagan v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Albuquerque v. State Employees Retirement CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009