Legal Opinion
St. George v. Gordon
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 1, 2003No. SC 16673PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The plaintiffs and the named defendant, Abraham I. Gordon, executor of the estate of Edwin Mak,1 jointly appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint and Gordon’s cross claim in this action for indemnification *541brought pursuant to General Statutes § 5-141d.2 The plaintiffs brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment that they should be indemnified by the state for a judgment rendered in their favor in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut against Mak, the former high sheriff for Fairfield County. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Doe v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. McElveenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Cadle Co. v. D'AddarioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- D'ERAMO v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Rivers v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.