Legal Opinion
First National Bank v. Shaw
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 1909No. Docket No. 19PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error to Presque Isle; Emerick, J. Assumpsit by the First National Bank of Durand against Thomas E. Shaw and others upon a promissory note. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendants on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
This case has once before been in this court, and is reported in 149 Mich. 362, 366 (112 N. W. 904, 905, 13 L. R. A. [N. S.] 426). In the opinion which was filed, after a citation of authorities, it is said:
“ These cases are not conclusive of the question involved here. An examination of the cases will not show one where part of the signatures were genuine and part forgeries, which had been placed thereon before the note was executed and delivered. Nor will they show a case where the alteration was made before the note was delivered. We think this is an important distinction.”
The opinion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trust Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Bradley v. MannMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Weidman v. SymesMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Johnston Harvester Co. v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- First National Bank v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cady v. Bay City Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Adolph Ramish, Inc. v. WoodruffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- National Bank of the Republic v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Van Slyke v. RooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. SymmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.