Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Shaw

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1907No. Docket No. 57PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Presque Isle; Emerick, J. Assumpsit by the First National Bank of Durand against Thomas E. Shaw and others on a promissory note. There was judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This action was brought upon a note reading as follows:

“$600.00 Onaway, Mich., Nov. 18th, 1901.

• “ On September 1st, 1903, after date, for value received, I promise to pay to Comstock & Crawford, or order, six hundred dollars at the Onaway Banking Company office in Onaway, Mich., with interest at 6 per cent, per annum, interest payable annually.”

Signed by Thomas E. Shaw and 19 others.

Plaintiff purchased this with two other notes, aggregating $2,000, and claimed to be a bona fide holder thereof. Defendants pleaded the general issue with notice that the note was procured by fraud on the part of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Deardorff v. ForesmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. McCormick v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. State ex rel. McCarty v. PepperIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Helms v. Wayne Agricultural Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Thompson v. Village of MecostaMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Paccar Financial Corp. v. Benton Trucking Service, Inc. (In Re Benton Trucking Service, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  3. Walker v. Michael W. Colton TrustDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  4. Marcia O'COnnOr v. Combined Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. Marcia O'COnnOr v. Combined Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API