Van Slyke v. Rooks
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa; Cross, J. Assumpsit by Charles E. Van Slyke against W. J. Rooks and others upon a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an action of assumpsit commenced in the circuit court for the county of Ottawa. The plaintiff filed a declaration-upon the common counts in assumpsit, and gave notice that, on the trial, he would, under the money counts, give in evidence a certain promissory note, a copy of which was attached to the declaration, and which reads as follows:
“600.00 Zeeland, Mich., Apr. 11, 1912.
“On May 1, 1913, after date, for value received, I promise to pay Calkins & Augsbury, or order, six hun*90dred dollars at the Zeeland at 6 per cent, per annum, State Bank, with interest interest payable annually.
“W.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Burson v. HuntingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Gibbs v. LinaburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Miller v. FinleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Douglass v. MattingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Shawmut Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Howard National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Molsons Bank v. BermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Ehle v. LookerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Robertson v. BudzierMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.