Legal Opinion

Johnston Harvester Co. v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant in assumpsit upon the following promissory note:

“ §100. Inkster, Mich., Not. 28, 1885.
“ On or before the first day of January, 1887, for value received, I, the undersigned, of the township of Taylor, county of Wayne, State of Michigan, promise to pay to the order of the Johnston Harvester Company, one hundred dollars (§100), payable at express office, Dearborn, Mich., with interest at -seven per cent, per annum from Nov. 1, 1885, until due, and ten per cent, after due.
“Joseph Miller.
“P. O. Address: Taylor, County, Wayne, State, Mich.”

This note was indorsed as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stubly v. BeachboardMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Browning v. GosnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Superior Court in and for County of CochiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. First National Bank v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Cowboy State Bank & Trust Co. v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Hunt v. RumseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API