Bradley v. Mann
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. Assumpsit on a promissory note. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
Mann, as holder of a note of the following *2tenor, brought this suit against the plaintiffs in error as endorsers to recover the amount it called for:
“$700. Flint, Mich., Feb. IS, 1875.
' ££ One year after date I promise to pay to the order of H. M. Bradley & Go. seven hundred dollars at value received, ivith interest at ten per cent.
II. WillTTLESFT. ’ ’
On the back was written ££H. M. Bradley & Co.”
The instrument was prepared by filling up a printed blank, and the parts in italics were written, the rest printed.
The Bradleys were in business at Bay City as partners under the firm name of ££H. M.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wood v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Benedict v. . CowdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Holmes v. TrumperMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Miller v. FinleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- McGrath v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Knoxville National Bank v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Weidman v. SymesMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- First National Bank v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Paccar Financial Corp. v. Benton Trucking Service, Inc. (In Re Benton Trucking Service, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
- First National Bank v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.