Weidman v. Symes
Michigan Supreme Court
Error’’ to Shiawassee; Smith, J. Assumpsit by,-William Weidman against George B. Symes on a promissory note. From a judgment for de- . fendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This case was in this court at the April term, 1898. It is reported in 116 Mich. 619. On the trial of the case in the court below from which that appeal was taken, the defendant had judgment. The case was reversed in this court, and remanded for a new trial. The new trial has been had, and judgment has again passed for defendant, under the direction of the court, and plaintiff brings error.
It appeared that on September 27, 1890, one John McBride borrowed of plaintiff $100, and gave the note in question as security, .with the defendant as joint maker. The note was drawn up by defendant, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holmes v. TrumperMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Miller v. FinleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Visher v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Rainbolt v. EddySupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Harvey v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Exchange Bank v. LesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Merritt v. A. W. Boyden & SonIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Hancock v. Empire Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Johnston v. HooverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Snicker v. ByersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.