Legal Opinion
School Dist. No. 2, Consolidated, Pushmataha Co. Ex Rel. Hixon v. Gossett, Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 10, 1929No. 20207PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.
This is an appeal from the district court of Pushmataha county, Okla., wherein consolidated school district No. 2, of Pushmataha county, Okla., ex rel. J. W. Hixon, W. B. Barlow, and Walter G. Piles, district school board, plaintiffs in error and plaintiffs in the trial court, brought an action against Louie O. Gossett, as county attorney of Pushmataha county, Okla., to require him as such county attorney to certify that a certain $2,500 bond issue alleged to have been voted by the electors of said school district was issued in conformity with the law and within the constitutional debt limit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- French v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- City of Council Bluffs v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Fairbanks-Morse Co. v. City of GearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Gentis v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Mitsler v. EyeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Potter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Stedman v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Board of Ed.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.