Legal Opinion
Mitsler v. Eye
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 9, 1924No. 15361PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
This is a second appeal from the district court of Craig county. It is an injunction suit seeking to prevent the issuance and sale of $25,000 bonds of consolidated school district No. 2 of Craig county, containing three school districts of Craig county and a part of a district in Nowata county.
On the first trial in the district court, an injunction was sought for alleged irregularities in the election forming such consolidated district, because of an alleged excessive indebtedness created by the proposed $25,000 bond issue, and the selection of an illegal site. .The injunction was denied.
On…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Seymour v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Culbertson v. City of FultonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Rasure v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Thompson Houston Electric Co. v. City of NewtonU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1890
- State ex rel. Marinette, Tomahawk & Western Railway Co. v. Common Council of TomahawkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- School Dist. No. 2, Consolidated, Pushmataha Co. Ex Rel. Hixon v. Gossett, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Hendricks v. School Dist. No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1932
- Huffman v. School Board of Independent Consolidated School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.