Legal Opinion

Stedman v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 22, 1935No. 24905PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the State Highway Commission in an action by plaintiff in error to recover consequential damages alleged to have resulted from the taking of a portion of plaintiff’s land for highway purposes and the construction of a bridge and roadway thereon.

Plaintiff’s land is described as the S. E. ],4 of tbe N. E. % of section 19, township 1 S., range 2 E., in Murray county.

The Washita river crosses U. S. Highway No. 77, State Highway No. 4, a short distance south and west of the southwest corner of plaintiff’s land. The highway runs north and a little east…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. School Dist. No. 2, Consolidated, Pushmataha Co. Ex Rel. Hixon v. Gossett, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Graham v. City of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Hawks v. WalshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. State Highway Commission v. BrixeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API