Legal Opinion
Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 18, 1997No. 81882PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
A recently enacted statute requires the County Assessor to visually inspect and revalue real property for ad valorem taxation purposes. It provides for apportionment of the Assessor’s revaluation costs among the local recipients of the tax revenues. The defendants are three Tulsa County school districts who have not paid their share of the Assessor’s revaluation expense. The plaintiff is the Tulsa County Assessor, who wants them to do so. Must the school districts pay the Assessor, and if so what are the procedures the Assessor must use to get paid? We conclude that (1) the…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Steamship Co. v. JoliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Metropolitan Railroad v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State ex rel. Macy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Tulsa County Budget Board v. Tulsa County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Independent School District No. I-20 of Muskogee County v. Oklahoma State Department of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.