Legal Opinion

Traders Bank v. Wilcox

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1919No. Civ. No. 2137PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This is an action brought to foreclose defendant’s equity of redemption in a note, copy of which is set out in plaintiff’s complaint, which was pledged by defendant to plaintiff as security for the payment of defendant’s note for two thousand dollars, which is also, set out in plaintiff’s complaint, and upon which default was made by defendant in payment according to its terms. The appeal is taken by plaintiff from the judgment, upon the judgment-roll alone.

By the briefs on file in this ease in this court it is made to appear that the only question here is as to whether plaintiff is entitled…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. RigdonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Commercial Savings Bank v. HornbergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Keeble v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. McArthur v. MageeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Richardson v. AshbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Mitchell v. Automobile Owners Indemnity UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. TRIPLE a MANAGEMENT CO. v. FrisoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Johnson v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API