Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Automobile Owners Indemnity Underwriters

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1941No. L. A. 17146PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDS, J. —

Considering only the essential facts relating to the controversy which is the subject of this appeal, the question for decision concerns the right of a pledgee to collect upon collateral more than four years after the note for which the collateral was given had matured.

The Insurance Commissioner of the state is liquidating Automobile Owners Indemnity Underwriters, an inter-insuronce exchange, under appointment of the superior court. In his capacity as liquidator, the commissioner holds a note and deed of trust made by one Bassett which were given to the Underwriters as collateral…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Rue v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Town of Santa Monica v. GuidingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. In Re Estate of PuseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Merced Security Savings Bank v. CasacciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hughes v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Estate of HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Chabrán Hernández v. Méndez RíosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API