Commercial Savings Bank v. Hornberger
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Two questions are presented on this appeal, one upon the statute of limitations, and the other with respect to the allowance of attorney’s fees.
1. The appellant Kate Hornberger claims that as to her the action is barred by the statute of limitations. The action is to recover a judgment debt against John A. Hornberger, to declare that the plaintiff holds a policy of insurance on his (Hornberger’s) life as a pledge for the securing of the debt against him, and that the interest of the defendant Kate Hornberger, if any she have in the said policy, is subject and subordinate to the lien of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Zellerbach v. AllenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Gage v. Riverside Trust Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1898
- Hudson v. WilkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Puckhaber v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Los Angeles Trust & Saving Bank v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- John M. C. Marble Co. v. Merchants' National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Foster v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Hornaday v. HornadayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.