Legal Opinion
Lenares v. Miano
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 24, 2002No. AC 22503PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The plaintiff, Katherine Leñares, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Michael Miaño. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) modified the attorney trial referee’s (referee) findings of fact by concluding that the plaintiffs loan to the defendant was in the nature of a demand note, (2) concluded that the six year statute of limitations had expired and (3) denied the plaintiffs motion to reargue. We agree with the plaintiff and reverse the judgment of the trial court.1
The plaintiff commenced this action on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Paulus v. LaSalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Johnson Electric Co. v. Salce Contracting Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Tolbert v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Flynn v. KaumeyerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
3Cited by8 opinions
- Florian v. LengeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- John H. Kolb & Sons, Inc. v. G & L Excavating, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Fleet National Bank v. LahmConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Fontanella v. MarcucciConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Lombard v. Edward J. Peters, Jr., P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.