Legal Opinion
Lombard v. Edward J. Peters, Jr., P.C.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 9, 2003No. AC 22109PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The plaintiffs, James R. Lombard and Lombard Associates, Inc., appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered after the court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant Meadows Condominium of Middletown Association, Inc.1 On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment when it determined that the plaintiffs’ action was barred by the two year statute of limitations set forth in General Statutes § 52-S84.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Our Supreme Court set forth the facts and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Lombard v. Edward J. Peters, Jr., P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Sanborn v. GreenwaldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Lambert v. StovellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Radezky v. Sargent & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doe v. Boy Scouts of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Lind-Larsen v. Fleet National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Sinotte v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Reilly v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Doe v. Boy Scouts of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.