Brookshire Oil Co. v. Casmalia Ranch Oil & Dev. Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Three separate appeals are presented upon the same transcript; an appeal by the plaintiff from the parts of the judgment consisting of paragraphs numbered two and three; an appeal by the plaintiff from an order denying its motion for a new trial, and an appeal by the defendant company, which for brevity we will call the Casmalia Oil Company, from the part of the judgment consisting of paragraph numbered one. The defendant’s appeal was taken more than sixty days after the entry of the judgment and it does not present the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the part appealed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lowther Oil Co. v. Miller-Sibley Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
- Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Steelsmith v. GartlanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
- Huggins v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1900
- Venture Oil Co. v. FrettsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- La Laguna Ranch Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Cassinos v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.