Legal Opinion

Steelsmith v. Gartlan

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1898PublishedCited by 70 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Ritchie Count}'. Bill by Amos Steelsmith against James Gartlan and others. Decree for defendants and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Dent, Judge:

On the 30th day of August, 1889, Knotts and Garber obtained a lease for oil purposes covering the land in controversy in this suit, without other consideration than one-eighth of the oil produced and two hundred dollars per an-num for each paying gas well, with the stipulation that the lessees should complete a well within one year from the date of the lease; and the failure to do so rendered the lease null and void unless the lessees should pay twenty-five cents per acre from and after the time above specified for the completion of said well, when such payment should operate to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williamson v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bettman v. HarnessWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Venture Oil Co. v. FrettsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Petroleum Co. v. Coal, Coke, & Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Cowan v. Radford Iron Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Lowther Oil Co. v. Miller-Sibley Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Sult v. A. Hochstetter Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Huggins v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1900
  4. South Penn Oil Co. v. SnodgrassWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Parish Fork Oil Co. v. Bridgewater Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1902

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API