Legal Opinion

Rich v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 13, 2001No. Civ.A. DKC 00-2712PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHASANOW, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Larry Allen Rich and Gloria Jean Hall, filed suit against Defendants, United States of America, Agent George Dysico of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), and other unnamed FBI agents, under the Federal Tort Claims Act (Count I), and alleging violations of Plaintiffs’ rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution (Count II), violations of Plaintiffs’ civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Count II — A), 1 assault and battery, false arrest and illegal imprisonment, intentional infliction…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Takacs v. FioreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
  2. Arbabi v. Fred Meyers, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  3. Curtis v. PrachtDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  4. Williams v. Prince George's County, MDDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  5. Tinch v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API