Legal Opinion
Takacs v. Fiore
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 8, 2007No. CCB-06-2343PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BLAKE, District Judge.
Alicia Takacs is suing Michele and Rosi-na Fiore 1 (“the Fiores”), Fiore Winery, Inc. (“the Winery”), and Getintegrated, Inc. (“Getintegrated”) due to the sexual harassment she allegedly experienced while working at the Winery. 2 Michele Fiore, an owner of the Winery and the alleged harasser, has moved to dismiss the intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) claim against him, and the Winery has moved for dismissal of or summary judgment on the Title VII claim against it. Getintegrated, which describes itself as a “professional employer…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Rubino v. New Acton Mobile Industries, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Evans v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Newcomer v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P. (In Re Newcomer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Alexander v. Prince George's County Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Amarachi Nwankpah v. Aledade, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.