Legal Opinion

Tinch v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 11, 2002No. CIV.A. DKC 2001-1104PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHASANOW, District Judge.

Presently pending and ready for resolution in this case alleging violation of constitutional rights, state law civil rights claims, and tortious conduct is the motion of Defendants United States of America (“United States”) and the officers in their official capacities to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. 1 The issues have been fully briefed and no hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion will be granted.

I. Background

The following facts are…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dorato v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  2. Durham v. RappDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  3. Higgins v. Food Lion, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  4. Hampel v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  5. Annappareddy v. ArnoldDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API