Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Peck

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 11, 1933PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugo, C.J.

These four suits in equity and one action at law concern land and water used in connection with the water supply of the city of Springfield. The same person was appointed master and auditor who, after taking a view of the various properties involved, filed a comprehensive report in each case. The evidence is not reported. After the reports were filed the trial judge without objection heard evidence (which is not reported) and found certain facts in addition to those stated in the reports. Interlocu*621tory decrees were entered confirming the master’s reports and final decrees dismissing the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Higginson v. Treasurer & School House CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Byfield v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Attorney General v. City of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. National Shawmut Bank v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Kornoff v. Kingsburg Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Stockus v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Amory v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API