Legal Opinion

Amory v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 9, 1947PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This is a petition for the assessment of dam-áges arising from the talcing and diversion by the Commonwealth, acting through the metropolitan district water supply commission in accordance with St. 1927, c. 321, of certain waters of the Swift River in connection with the construction and maintenance of the Quabbin Reservoir, which also receives the waters diverted from the Ware River under St. 1926, c. 375, and serves as an additional supply of water for certain cities and towns situated outside the metropolitan water district.

The Chicopee River begins at the confluence of the Ware, Swift and…

2Cases cited120 opinions

  1. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Connecticut v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Boston Gas Co. v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  2. State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Kelly v. O'NEILMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API