Barnes v. City of Springfield
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
These are two petitions in which the petitioners, who are husband and wife, seek damages for the taking by the city of Springfield on or about January 21, 1907, for the purposes of a water supply under the authority of St. 1906, c. 317, of land in Russell, Westfield and Gran-ville, and of waters of the Westfield Little River, and its tributaries, at and above the designated point of diversion. They also seek to recover other damages to their property and expenses. A bill of exceptions was filed by the petitioners and another by the respondent.
The first petition was entered January 20, 1909,…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Edmands v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Batman v. MegowanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Brooks v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Commonwealth v. SissonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Board of Assessors v. Suffolk Law SchoolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.