Legal Opinion

Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLC

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 2009No. A06-2284PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Justice.

Respondent Wayne Rratzer brought this action against his former employer, Welsh Companies, LLC (Welsh), alleging that Welsh terminated his employment in violation of Minnesota’s whistleblower statute, Minn.Stat. § 181.932, subd. 1(a) (2008).1 The district court granted Welsh’s summary judgment motion, but the court of appeals reversed. Kratzer v. Welsh Cos., No. A06-2284, 2008 WL 1747607, at *1 (Minn.App. Apr. 15, 2008).2 We granted *16Welsh’s petition for review on the whistle-blower claim. Because we conclude that Kratzer has not demonstrated that he engaged in protected…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Nordling v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Brayton v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API