Legal Opinion
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 13, 2010No. A08-583PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
Respondents Virgil Dykes and Connie Dykes, d/b/a Dykes Farms, commenced this lawsuit against appellant Sukup Manufacturing Company asserting claims of consumer fraud, negligence, and breach of warranty arising out of the purchase and operation of an allegedly defective grain-moving system manufactured by Sukup. Sukup denied the allegations of the complaint and moved for summary judgment alleging that when the Dykes released and dismissed their claims against the equipment dealer, Superior, Inc., in a mediated agreement arising from a prior lawsuit, the Dykes also…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Steven Demarais v. Gurstel Chargo, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Savela v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.