State v. . Hill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
It has been, the uniform holding with us that when a defendant in a criminal prosecution, on trial in the Superior Court, enters a plea of “Not guilty” to the charge preferred against him, he may not thereafter, without changing his plea, waive his constitutional right of trial by jury. S. v. Hartsfield, 188 N. C., 357, 124 S. E., 629; S. v. Rogers, 162 N. C., 656, 78 S. E., 293. And this applies to misdemeanors as well as to felonies. S. v. Pulliam, 184 N. C., 681, 114 S. E., 394.
True, special verdicts are permissible in criminal cases, but when such procedure is had, all the essential facts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . HartsfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- State v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- State v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- State v. . PulliamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- State v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. . EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. . LuedersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Henry C. Alford v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.