Legal Opinion

State v. Hudson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 99PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

Defendant brings forward only one assignment of error, the failure of the court to allow his motion for nonsuit. He asserts that all the evidence tends to show that the purpose of his assaults upon Clemmie was not to rape her but to engage in perverted and unnatural sex acts.

Considering the grievous injuries which defendant inflicted upon Clemmie — especially the head injury — we may doubt whether she was able to remember and recount all that defendant did to her. Yet, upon the assumption that she told all, we hold her testimony sufficient to withstand the motion for non-suit.

Th…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GammonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. State v. . CambySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. State v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. State v. . MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1854
  5. State v. MabrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. AsheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API