State v. Emery
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, 0. J.
The questions here posed are (1) whether a jury of ten men and two women suffices as a jury of “good and lawful men” within the meaning of Art. I, sec. 13, of the Constitution; and (2) whether trial by such jury complies with “the law of the land” and accords with “the ancient mode of trial by jury” vouchsafed in Art. I, secs. 17 and 19, of the Constitution. While these are questions of first impression, the construction heretofore placed on the subject sections of the Constitution would seem to point to negative answers.
The pertinent clauses follow:
“No person shall be convicted…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Carter v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Martin v. PrestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.