Legal Opinion

State v. . Pulliam

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1922PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was prosecuted in the municipal court of the city of Winston-Salem, the charge against him being that "at and in the county aforesaid, and within the corporate limits of the city of Winston-Salem, or within one mile of the corporate limits of the city of Winston-Salem, he did unlawfully and willfully keep his store, shop, fruit stand, icecream stand, or soft-drink stand open on Sunday, for the purpose of the sale of goods, merchandise, and soft drinks, and did sell coca-cola and other soft drinks on Sunday, against the statute in such cases made and provided, and against the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cancemi v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Hennington v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. State v. Lytle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Rodman v. Robinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. State v. HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. . EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. State v. EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API