Legal Opinion

State v. . Hartsfield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1924PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

The defendant, in limine, lodged a motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. It is alleged that the information which the defendant considers vital and important to his defense, came to his attention after the adjournment of the term of court at which the case was tried, and after the appeal was docketed here. Allen v. Gooding, 174 N. C., 271. It is the settled rule of practice with us, established by a long and uniform line of decisions, that new trials will not be awarded by this Court in criminal prosecutions for newly discovered evidence. S. v. Williams, 185 N.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. . StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. State v. . JacobsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. State v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. State v. Lilliston.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Robertson v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. State v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API