State v. . Lueders
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J\
Tbe purpose of this appeal, frankly avowed, is to obtain a reconsideration of the decision in S. v. Lawrence, 213 N. C., 674, and to test again the constitutionality of ch. 155, Public Laws 1935.
There are certain irregularities appearing on the face of the record which preclude a consideration of the constitutional question. S. v. Smith, 211 N. C., 206, 189 S. E., 509.
In the first place, the defendant entered no plea in the Superior Court, where, on appeal, the cause was to be tried de novo. In fact, it does not appear whether he was present when the case was heard. In the absence…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Hopkins Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ClearySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Person v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Mazda Motors of America, Inc. v. Southwestern Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Martin v. North Carolina Housing CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Bulova Watch Co. v. Brand Distributors of North Wilkesboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.