Legal Opinion

Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1999PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Florise Smith (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to grant a modification petition filed by Saunder’s House (Employer). We reverse.

On May 25, 1993, Claimant sustained a lumbrosacral strain in the course of her employment as a nursing assistant at Employer’s place of business. As a result of her injury, Claimant did not work from June 2, 1993 to June 20, 1993. Claimant returned and worked from June 20, 1993 to August 12, 1993, at which point her injuries caused her to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Sporio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Mosgo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Moats v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Latrobe Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Montgomery Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Bey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Darrall v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Hill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Hill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API