Legal Opinion

Latrobe Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 1992No. Docket No. 326 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEDERER, Senior Judge.

Latrobe Steel Company (Latrobe) petitions for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (the Board), which affirmed a referee’s decision to dismiss Latrobe’s petition for termination, suspension or modification of benefits for David. R. Henderson (the Claimant), pursuant to Section 423(a) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act,1 77 P.S. § 772. We affirm.

The record discloses the following factual background:

The Claimant sustained a compensable injury on August 20, 1981, while in the course of his employment as a utility craneman for Latrobe. He…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. York Terrace/Beverly Enterprises v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Sheehan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Four-Way Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Badyrka v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API