Darrall v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FLAHERTY, Senior Judge.
Shannon Darrall (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting Claimant’s Claim Petition for a closed period and then suspending her benefits based on Claimant’s ability to perform a light-duty job. We affirm in part and reverse in part the decision of the WCJ and remand this case for the reasons set forth below.
On February 1, 1999, H.J. Heinz Co. (Employer) filed a Notice of Workers’ Compensation Denial (Notice of Denial) declining to pay Claimant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Connor v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Lemansky v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Potere v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Armstrong v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Bey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Motor Coils MFG/Wabtec v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.