Sporio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIGRO, Justice.
The claim petitions of Appellant Madeline Sporio and her deceased husband Lawrence Sporio were denied under the Workers’ Compensation Act, 77 P.S. § 411(2)(1992), based upon a finding that the claims did not satisfy the Act’s disability and disease manifestation requirements. For the reasons discussed below, we find that Appellant is entitled to benefits and thus, we reverse.
Lawrence Sporio worked as a bricklayer for approximately twenty-five years. On June 17, 1988, he filed claim petitions against several employers, including Appellee Songer Construction, and alleged…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harper & Collins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Toffalori v. Donatelli Granite Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Hankee v. Wilkes-Barre/Scranton International AirportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Antonucci v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Krauss, C. v. Trane US Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Chenot v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Tooey v. AK Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- LTV Steel Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.