Legal Opinion

Hill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll)

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SENIOR JUDGE KELLEY.

Bernestine Hill (Claimant) petitioned this Court for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that concluded that Claimant’s total disability changed to partial disability on the basis that suitable alternative work was made available to Claimant, which work Claimant refused. In our prior disposition of this case in Hill v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll), 745 A.2d 56 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999) 1 (Hill I), we reversed the Board’s order to the extent that it modified Claimant’s disability status and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. McCloskey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brandywine Mazda Suzuki v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. C. Sealey v. WCAB (Elwyn Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. S. Thiams v. WCAB (Canada Dry Delaware Valley)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API