Legal Opinion

Bell v. Huson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1960No. Civ. 18753PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

This appeal arises from a personal injury action in which appellant obtained a verdict and resulting judgment for $5,000. Thereupon the trial court, although it had denied previous motions for a nonsuit and directed ver diet, granted respondent’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict “since it ... is this Court’s opinion that there was no substantial evidence upon which the verdict can stand. ...” Denying respondent’s alternate motion for a new trial, the court also stated that if “such decision to grant judgment notwithstanding the verdict is not affirmed in the event of appeal”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Rodabaugh v. TekusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Bagwill v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Devens v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hildebrand v. Los Angeles Junction Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Di Sandro v. GriffithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. People v. BlazinaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
  3. Beaird v. BryanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Forwood v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Forwood v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API