Legal Opinion

People v. Blazina

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided January 20, 1976No. Crim. A. No. 13581PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARSHALL, P. J.

Defendant was charged with jaywalking (Veh. Code, § 21955). Although defendant refused to promise to appear unless he was given the citation first, he finally did sign after the officer called up a “backup” officer.

Section 21955 of the Vehicle Code provides as follows; “Between adjacent intersections controlled bv traffic control signal devices or by police officers, pedestrians shall not cross the roadway at any place except in a crosswalk.” (Italics added.)

*Supp. 37The citation alleged that defendant did cross Cahuenga Boulevard between Selma Avenue and Hollywood…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bell v. HusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Opinion No. (1997), California Attorney General Reports1997
  2. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API