Legal Opinion

Geisenhoff v. Mabrey

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1943No. Civ. 12265PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

In this action the court originally made findings and entered judgment for plaintiff for $5,000. In denying defendants’ motion for a new trial the court required plaintiff to remit $2,000. Defendants appeal from the judgment thus reduced.

The judgment is for the reasonable value of services of a promotional nature rendered by plaintiff in connection with a project for construction and operation of an ice skating rink in San Jose. Judgment is against Ice Bowl, Inc., a corporation, and against defendants Mabrey, Hollenbeck, Streeter and Schwab. The individual defendants are directors and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nylund v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Lundberg v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Seib v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. KuderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Estate of ReinhertzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Pearson v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Claremont Press Publishing Co. v. BarksdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. CADC/RADC Venture 2011-1 LLC v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API