Geisenhoff v. Mabrey
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
In this action the court originally made findings and entered judgment for plaintiff for $5,000. In denying defendants’ motion for a new trial the court required plaintiff to remit $2,000. Defendants appeal from the judgment thus reduced.
The judgment is for the reasonable value of services of a promotional nature rendered by plaintiff in connection with a project for construction and operation of an ice skating rink in San Jose. Judgment is against Ice Bowl, Inc., a corporation, and against defendants Mabrey, Hollenbeck, Streeter and Schwab. The individual defendants are directors and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nylund v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Lundberg v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Seib v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- People v. KuderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by20 opinions
- Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Estate of ReinhertzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Pearson v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Claremont Press Publishing Co. v. BarksdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- CADC/RADC Venture 2011-1 LLC v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.