CADC/RADC Venture 2011-1 LLC v. Bradley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DONDERO, J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff CADC/RADC Venture 2011-1 LLC brought this deficiency action to enforce commercial guaranty agreements executed by defendants Richard J. Bradley and G. Reynolds Yates. Defendants argued the guaranties were shams, and therefore unenforceable, due to their close relationship with the borrower on the subject loan, Nohea Napa Gateway, LLC (Nohea). Defendants in turn brought a counterclaim against plaintiff, as well as its servicing agent, Sabal Financial Group, LP (Sabal), asserting their attempts to enforce the guaranties constituted an unfair business…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Bardin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Davidson v. Seterus, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- LSREF2 Clover Property 4, LLC v. Festival Retail Fund 1, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Alexandria Real Estate etc. v. Bugsby Property, LLC CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.