Legal Opinion

People v. Kuder

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1929No. Docket No. 1757PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

This case was before us on motion to dismiss an appeal by the People (People v. Kuder et al., 90 Cal. App. 594 [266 Pac. 337]), and upon the merits of that appeal, the same being from an order granting a motion in arrest of judgment (People v. Kuder et al., 93 Cal. App. 42 [269 Pac. 198; Id., 93 Cal. App. 55 [269 Pac. 630]).

It appears that during the month of July, 1925, a corporation named Fishelton Farms, Incorporated, was incorporated under the laws of this state by J. M. Kuder, Edward B. Fishel, U. R. Fishel, C. G. Luke and Stephen Bedford, appellant herein. In August of the same year, by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hermes v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  3. People v. KuderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. BlackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. HouchinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. People v. OlfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Geisenhoff v. MabreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Cecil B. De Mille Productions, Inc. v. WooleryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  5. Julian v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API