Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Norton
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 24, 1964No. Civ. 7193PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN (R. M.), J. *
This appeal originated in a transaction for the sale, purchase and exchange of real and personal property giving rise to the complaint for damages based on fraud and deceit, on the one hand, and the cross-complaint for damages based on fraud and deceit, on the other hand. At the outset of trial the complaint was dismissed. The issues in the case are those raised by the cross-complaint, as amended, and the answers thereto.
Cross-complainants and respondents, Philip Norton and Lalita Norton, owned certain realty improved with duplex bungalows situated in Seal Beach. Dr. Robert…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Minton v. CavaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Soliman v. Philip Morris IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Odorizzi v. Bloomfield School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Okun v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.