Legal Opinion

Seib v. Mitchell

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1935No. Civ. 10444; Civ. 10445PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

These actions were commenced against the executor of the will of Elizabeth J. Herbst, after rejection by the executor of claims presented in the probate proceedings. John O. Seib and Etta B. Seib are husband and wife and Mrs. Seib was the niece of Mrs. Herbst. It is set forth in Mrs. Seib’s complaint that in April, 1917, Mrs. Herbst requested her to render services continuously during such part of the remainder of Mrs. Herbst's life as she might require, and that Mrs. Herbst agreed to pay plaintiff at the time of her death by bequeathing to her and her husband all or practically all of her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Koeberle v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Nylund v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Warder v. HutchisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Moulin v. ColumbetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Long v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Lazzarevich v. LazzarevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Estate of ReinhertzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Lloyd v. KleefischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Lundberg v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API