Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Ockrassa

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1990No. SB-89-0011-D. Disc. Comm. No. 86-1452PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

The State Bar filed a complaint on January 12, 1988, alleging that respondent violated the ethical rules regarding conflicts of interest. The Hearing Committee (Committee) filed its report on September 13, 1988, finding that respondent violated Ethical Rule 1.9, Rules of Professional Conduct, contained in Rule 42, Rules of the Supreme Court. The Committee recommended an informal reprimand.

The Disciplinary Commission (Commission) heard oral argument on the matter on November 12, 1988. Its report, issued on December 6, 1988, recommended that respondent be suspended from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re HimmelIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. LatigueArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  4. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, KerstingArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Matter of PetrieArizona Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In Re ShannonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Keenan v. HatcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Gatewood v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. Gatewood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API