Richey v. McGinnis Investment Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Having procured a competent offer to buy certain realty and an acceptance thereof by the owners who had listed the property with the corporate respondent, appellant as selling agent sued to recover his portion of the brokerage paid to the corporation. His suit having been rejected below, he demands a reversal of the judgment on the ground that his task as salesman was finished when the offer of the buyers had been accepted by the sellers.
Respondent corporation was a licensed real estate broker with respondent Donald M. McGinnis, hereinafter referred to as Donald, also a licensed real estate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Brown v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Merriman v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Pellaton v. BrunskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Barnes v. OsgoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bishop v. NorellArizona Supreme Court · 1960