Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Osgood

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1930No. Docket No. 5639PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNELL, J., pro tem.

The appellants, who owned an equity in two lots in the city of Los Angeles, entered into a written listing agreement with the respondent whereby they granted to him “the exclusive and irrevocable right to sell the same” within the period of forty-five days after February 14, 1925, “for $7,000, and to accept a deposit thereon, cash 1027, balance as per contract—three payments 1991 each, interest and taxes to date of assignment to be paid by seller.” (Italics ours.) The agreement further provided: “I hereby agree to pay said agent as commission price received above 7000 of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Phelps v. PruschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Purcell v. FirthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Cober v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Richardson v. Walter Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Rylee v. De FiniAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1955
  5. Martin v. Culver Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API