Barnes v. Osgood
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BURNELL, J., pro tem.
The appellants, who owned an equity in two lots in the city of Los Angeles, entered into a written listing agreement with the respondent whereby they granted to him “the exclusive and irrevocable right to sell the same” within the period of forty-five days after February 14, 1925, “for $7,000, and to accept a deposit thereon, cash 1027, balance as per contract—three payments 1991 each, interest and taxes to date of assignment to be paid by seller.” (Italics ours.) The agreement further provided: “I hereby agree to pay said agent as commission price received above 7000 of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Phelps v. PruschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Purcell v. FirthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Cober v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Richardson v. Walter Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Rylee v. De FiniAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1955
- Martin v. Culver Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.