Bishop v. Norell
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
Appeal by defendant-seller from a summary judgment entered in plaintiff’s action to recover a brokerage commission allegedly earned by virtue of an open listing agreement between plaintiff and defendant.
The instant matter was consolidated below with a companion case, Young v. Bishop, 88 Ariz. 140, 353 P.2d 1017, which was an action by a group of buyers to enforce specific performance of an alleged contract of sale with the present defendant-seller. While it arose out of the same transaction involved in that case, the present controversy presents an issue basically distinct…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Irving v. Goodimate Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Weiner v. MullaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Chapin v. RubyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Young v. BishopArizona Supreme Court · 1960
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Yaggy v. BVD COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Haywood Securities, Inc. v. EhrlichArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Hansen v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Powell v. City of NewtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Stika v. AlbionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.