Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Norell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1960No. 6716PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

Appeal by defendant-seller from a summary judgment entered in plaintiff’s action to recover a brokerage commission allegedly earned by virtue of an open listing agreement between plaintiff and defendant.

The instant matter was consolidated below with a companion case, Young v. Bishop, 88 Ariz. 140, 353 P.2d 1017, which was an action by a group of buyers to enforce specific performance of an alleged contract of sale with the present defendant-seller. While it arose out of the same transaction involved in that case, the present controversy presents an issue basically distinct…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Irving v. Goodimate Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Weiner v. MullaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Chapin v. RubyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Young v. BishopArizona Supreme Court · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Yaggy v. BVD COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Haywood Securities, Inc. v. EhrlichArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Hansen v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Powell v. City of NewtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Stika v. AlbionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API